Research & Insights for Workplace Wellbeing

Explore open-access research and evidence, expert insights, and practical frameworks, carefully curated and summarised, with clear takeaways to support confident, informed decision-making across the workplace wellbeing industry.

1 Result

Effects of Workplace Interventions on Sedentary Behaviour and Physical Activity: An Ambrella Review with Meta-analyses and Narrative Synthesis

Thomas Rouyard; Emilie Yoda; Katika Akksilp; Anna Valeria Dieterich; Sarin Kc; Saudamini V Dabak; Andre Matthias Müller

The Lancet Public Health

2025 April

DOI: 10.1016/S2468-2667(25)00038-6

Elsevier Ltd

Licence Label: CC BY 4.0

This umbrella review examines how effective workplace interventions are at reducing sedentary behaviour and increasing physical activity.  The clearest finding is that environmental changes, particularly sit-to-stand desks, consistently reduce occupational sitting time, in some cases by over an hour per workday. Step counts also increase when self-monitoring is combined with behavioural support strategies.  However, increases in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity are inconsistent, and many parts of the evidence base are rated low or very low certainty.

The message is not that workplace movement initiatives fail, rather that effects are outcome-specific, often modest, and confidence in the strength and durability of evidence varies.

This paper sharpens the conversation from “does it work?” to “what works, and for which outcome?”

  • Reducing sitting time has the strongest and most consistent support
  • Step-based programmes show measurable but moderate gains
  • Increasing higher-intensity activity remains challenging
  • Evidence certainty varies considerably across intervention types
  • Environmental changes appear more reliable than education alone

For HR leaders and providers, the implication is clear: be precise about the behavioural goal. If the aim is less sitting, the evidence is relatively strong. If the aim is substantially more physical activity, expectations should be realistic, and programmes should combine structural change with behavioural support.

Copyright: © 2025 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. The original work remains the intellectual property of the authors and publisher. Commentary by The Well Crowd. © The Well Crowd Ltd. 2026. All rights reserved. This content provides a summary and independent commentary on the original research and does not reproduce the original publication. It is intended for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional or medical advice. No part of this content may be reproduced or distributed without prior written permission.

The List, your Trusted Workplace Wellbeing Directory

A curated community where People Leaders find trusted Workplace Wellbeing providers, and providers find meaningful business.